Measurement

More than 4 billion people live in low- and middle-income countries, and AI may reshape their jobs, productivity, education, health, and access to law. However, the world is making AI investment and policy decisions with little evidence about how the technology is reaching these populations, what they use it for, and which bottlenecks constrain its benefits. We are building measurement and modeling infrastructure to understand AI's economic implications for LMICs.

What we will measure

Low-income contexts have little real-time measurement, so it will need to be constructed. We are working on new projects that measure AI access, usage, local usefulness, and economic effects. Stay tuned for more.

Help build the evidence →

Questions in this area

How do the world’s poor use AI?

What we've found

In a project in Sierra Leone, teachers submitted 40,350 queries to an AI chatbot in WhatsApp over 17 months. More teachers used the chatbot than web search for teaching assistance each month.

What we're asking

We're exploring who else is currently using AI, with a particular eye to less resourced populations. Has AI reached only people of certain income levels, education levels, and regions? What do they use it for? Do only speakers of certain languages use AI?

What are the bottlenecks to benefitting from AI?

What we're asking

What most constrains the benefits of AI: connectivity, devices, costs, language gaps, local data, education? How can we use data to measure these gaps? What policies and markets can best fill them?

How might AI transform economies?

What we’re asking

AI could have transformative economic effects. How could machine intelligence reshape economic opportunities for people in low- and middle-income countries? Will AI leave the developing world behind? How should policy respond?